On Living A Life Without Meaning:
Let's assume someone is not religious and does not believe in a Western
God or a variation of the Savior myth (or someone is sufficiently
skeptical to dismiss the payoff of heaven).
Why would one who does NOT want to A) investigate life with an eye for
observation, in an effort to advance human understanding, scientifically
and/or technologically, B ) does not want to participate and add
anything meaningful to the human conversation with original creations of
art, music, literature, or otherwise, C) does not want to procreate in
order to add resources and prolong the human experiment and, C) does
not, at least, find value in the sensory pleasures of the fruits of
man's labor thus far, rich foods, booze and merriment, porn and easy
sex, etc., want to go through the motions to sustain life?
It would seem as if that person would just be biding time, meaninglessly
working and eating and sleeping and generally trudging about, before
they sighed their last breath. It would seem that if, after an honest
and thorough evaluation, of course, one were to deem that their life was
more work and cost than it was worth and beneficial, would the most
efficient and rational course of action, then, be to just, how do you
say it nicely, unplug yourself from the game?
We regard the suicidal as irrational and mentally ill, but what about
the man who exists with no merit? Wouldn't it be easier for the
apathetic to save time? Doesn't it seem much more irrational, instead,
to waste 70+ years putting fuel in your body to, not participate, but to
watch people, like human isotopes, electrons, and ions, interact and
share and grow and (brain) chemically change in this big test tube we
inhabit?
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment